Exploring the Potential for More Competitive Distances in Rowing
WorldRowing.com states that the 2000-meter race distance in competitive rowing was established in 1894. Before this, race distances varied widely, leading to inconsistent judgments of speed and performance. The 2000-meter distance helped unify the rowing community. Today, the 2K distance is regarded as a premier test of human middle-distance endurance. Some in our community view other race distances (excluding head races and Henley) as less traditional.
After 126 years of 2000-meter racing (with some exceptions), it’s worth evaluating the success of this standard. While it’s true that the 2000m distance has unified the rowing world, has it made rowing accessible to a broader audience?
Over a year ago, JRN published my article about the LA2028 race distance. If you haven’t read it yet, it might be worth a look. Not much has changed since then, but the conversation might gain momentum now that the Paris Olympics is finished. A key point from that article has been on my mind:
Diversity of opportunity translates well into socio-economic and ethnic diversity.
The idea was that offering more competitive opportunities (i.e., multiple competitive distances) could attract a more socio-economically and ethnically diverse group of competitors. If this holds true, could the reverse also be true? Is rowing’s lack of diversity partly due to the exclusive focus on the 2000-meter distance?
Let’s examine who benefits most from the 2000-meter distance. From my LA28 article:
“A 2000-meter rowing race suits a specific body type and physiological makeup that sits at least three standard deviations beyond the mean of the worldwide population. Training for 2000 meters requires specific locations with many kilometers of rowable water that is safe and protected; rare locations that either must be discovered or dug out. When you put together all the variables needed to create an optimal athlete/training situation at any level, it is no surprise that rowing is such a small community.”
It’s generally accepted that taller individuals have a competitive advantage over 2000 meters. Reducing the distance to 500 meters could mitigate this advantage through training for strength, power, and rate. Increasing the distance to 5000 meters could emphasize fitness and technical execution. Any distance between 4 and 10 minutes will likely favor taller individuals. Notably, the top 24 countries with the tallest average height for men are all European.
In addition to favoring a specific body type, the 2000-meter distance requires extensive rowable water. Most coaches agree that a straight 2000-meter course is the minimum for regular training access, but a sheltered 10K course with long straight stretches is ideal. These conditions are often found in rural areas or in urban areas dominated by commercial fleet traffic, making optimal training environments rare and hard to access.
The lack of diversity in rowing may be influenced by the exclusive focus on the 2000-meter event. While the pride in enduring this challenging distance is significant, it may also limit participation. Rowing is a small sport; offering multiple distances could attract a wider range of athletes.
Rowing’s community is predominantly of European descent. This disparity isn’t solely racial or ethnic but also linked to resource availability. Expanding competitive opportunities can foster a more diverse group of competitors.
Standardization has its benefits. The rowing community initially standardized the 2000-meter distance to create consistent opportunities, as previous race distances were random and difficult to compare. Regattas could offer a variety of distances, such as 500m, 1000m, 1500m, 2K, and even 5K or head races. This approach is akin to having Olympic marathons alongside track events and open water swims. Organizing such events would require careful planning, but it is achievable.
By creating standardized distances, we can open the doors to a more diverse and inclusive rowing community.
About The Author
