Policies, meetings, and a fantasy of safety – what began as a practical effort to mitigate risks has spiralled into a world where laminated policies and noticeboards plastered with rules create the illusion of safety but rarely deliver it. This is the “rowing safety paradox”, a system built on good intentions, overwhelmed by bureaucracy, and detached from the practical realities of the water.
The fantasy of perfect safety
It all starts innocently. A club introduces a few safety measures – risk assessments, visibility guidelines, and maybe a throwline requirement. These are sensible steps but, over time, the desire to address every potential risk and incident grows. Soon, policies multiply.
Every incident or near-miss triggers a committee meeting, resulting in another laminated rule added to the overflowing noticeboard. Policies expand to cover not just significant risks but hypothetical scenarios so specific they verge on fiction. What if a swan attacks you? This isn’t just overreaching, it’s a fantasy. It’s a fantasy that risks can be eliminated, that systems can account for every variable, and that perfect safety is possible if enough policies are written and everyone in the organisation does what they should.
The spiral into bureaucracy
In this world, the process of creating safety becomes more important than actual safety. Policies require exhaustive training sessions covering fog, wind, and water temperature protocols.
But on the water, reality looks very different. Rules are rarely enforced. Heel restraints go unchecked, and fog protocols are ignored as crews row out anyway, squinting through the mist. Risk assessments for every session are often neglected.
What about incident reporting? For many clubs, the British Rowing process for reporting safety concerns or near-misses has become so formalised that it discourages rowers from coming forward. People hesitate to report minor collisions or questionable decisions, dreading the paperwork, the drawn-out process, and the potential repercussions. Will they be blamed? Will they have to justify every decision made on the water? Will their concern morph into yet another laminated policy, with their name awkwardly shared through the rowing grapevine? This culture of silence means small problems go unreported until they escalate into bigger ones.
The paradox is clear. The more energy poured into rules and processes, the less effective they become. Rowers, inundated with information and stifled by red tape, stop engaging altogether. Safety becomes theatre – a system that looks robust but fails when it’s needed most.
The Ralph Wiggum Reality
Meanwhile, there are rowers siting in their boats like Ralph Wiggum from The Simpsons, nervously chuckling, “I’m in danger.” They assume the system will protect them, but when boats approach head-on, they lack the self-awareness to move or respond.
The illusion of control created by laminated policies fosters complacency. Rowers learn to follow rules, not to think critically or adapt. The result is a culture that prioritises compliance over responsible decision-making, leaving crews vulnerable and dependent on others to respond around them.
Public good
We don’t own the river. We share it.
Keeping it safe and enjoyable for everyone starts with simple acts of courtesy and awareness. Be nice to cruisers, respecting their space and offering a friendly wave. Give a little nod to kayakers to foster mutual respect. Educate the paddleboarders about staying to the correct side of the river. Skim around fishermen where possible.
Above all, look where you’re going. Awareness is the cornerstone of safety and harmony on the water. These small actions require no rulebooks, just a shared commitment to making the river a better place for all.
The cost of the fantasy
The obsession with policy-based safety doesn’t just waste resources, it actively undermines them. Hours spent drafting rules, debating hypothetical risks, or formalising incident reports could be used for practical training or coaching. New members, overwhelmed by jargon and protocols, disengage before they even start. Experienced rowers, infantilised by excessive rules, grow frustrated.
Instead of rigid rules and theoretical risks, clubs should focus on creating a culture of practical awareness and mutual respect. Like the Countryside Code’s simple principles – respect the outdoors, protect the environment, enjoy the outdoors – rowing safety should be grounded in straightforward, actionable guidelines. This doesn’t mean abandoning policies altogether but simplifying them, enforcing them meaningfully, and pairing them with real-world application. Rowers need to be equipped to handle the unpredictability of the river, not burdened by 30 pages of policies.
The rowing safety paradox unravelled
The true danger in rowing isn’t the dark, fog, current, or even other rowers. It’s the fantasy that safety can be achieved through enough rules. Real safety lies in rowers who communicate, adapt, respect navigational rules, and take shared responsibility for their environment.
So, next time another laminated policy appears on the noticeboard or someone hesitates to report a concern, ask: Is this really making anyone safer? Or is it time to step back, simplify, and refocus on what matters? The best safety system isn’t written in ink – it’s built on trust, awareness, and a little common sense.
About The Author
Discover more from JRN
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
